Sweden dramatically tightened its disability benefit system in 2008, cutting the caseload by nearly half within five years. But where did those people go? New evidence suggests a significant share moved into unemployment, social assistance, or informal care — not employment.

Sweden: From Disability Pension to Work-First — A Policy Experiment in Progress

The Swedish Reform Experiment

In 2008, the Reinfeldt government enacted one of the most radical disability benefit reforms in OECD history. The sjukersättning (sickness compensation) was frozen to new entrants, time-limits were placed on sjukpenning (sickness benefit), and a new mandatory "rehabilitation chain" (rehabiliteringskedja) imposed strict return-to-work assessments at fixed intervals.

The caseload results were dramatic. The number of people on long-term sickness compensation fell from approximately 570,000 in 2006 to under 280,000 by 2012 — a reduction of more than 50% in six years.

Swedish and international observers initially described this as a remarkable policy success. The story was more complicated.

Where Did the Caseload Go?

Three major research projects have tracked the trajectories of people who left the sickness compensation system post-2008:

Stockholm University (Stenberg & Westerlund, 2015): Tracking 44,000 individuals terminated from sickness benefit under the new rules:

Sweden: From Disability Pension to Work-First — A Policy Experiment in Progress

Sweden: From Disability Pension to Work-First — A Policy Experiment in Progress

The Swedish Reform Experiment

Where Did the Caseload Go?

The Social Insurance Assessment Controversy

What Works in Sweden

The Current Picture

The Policy Lesson

Теги

Пов'язані статті

Будьте в курсі